Embedded Assessment 1 Rubric/English 9
Presenting an
Interview Narrative
Scoring Criteria
|
Emerging: 2 (70-79%)
|
Proficient: 3 (80-89)
|
Exemplary: 4(90-100)
|
Ideas
|
An incident may not be described in
detail and little to no attention is paid to the descriptive categories.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
The narrative describes an incident
from the person’s high school experience clearly and effectively. The writer
mentions examples from the three descriptive categories.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
The narrative insightfully describes at
least one incident from the person’s high school experience which influenced
his/her coming of age with careful attention to detail.
The writer vividly uses examples from
the three descriptive categories.
1
2 3 4 5
6 7
8 9 10
|
Organization
|
The narrative may not be
multi-paragraphed and/or organized in a logical fashion.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
The narrative is multi-paragraphed and
organized in a logical fashion.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
The narrative is multi-paragraphed and
organized in a way that enhances the reader’s understanding.
1
2 3 4
5 6 7
8 9 10
|
Use of Language
|
The voice of the interviewee is not
clear, imagery, diction, and use of quotations are inappropriate or missing.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
Clear imagery, diction, and use of
quotations convey a sense of the interviewee’s voice.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
Vivid imagery, careful diction, and
effective use of direct and indirect quotes convey a strong sense of the
interviewee’s voice.
1
2 3 4
5 6 7
8 9 10
|
Conventions
|
Frequent errors in standard writing
conventions interfere with the meaning. Quotations from the interview are not
properly incorporated into the text.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
Though some errors may appear, they do
not seriously impede readability. The writer properly punctuates and
capitalizes quotations in the text.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
Writing is virtually error free. The
writer uses proper punctuation and capitalization to smoothly
Embed quotations from the interviewee’s
voice.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
Evidence of Writing Process
|
The writing lacks evidence of planning,
revision, and/or editing. The draft is not ready for publication
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
The writing demonstrates planning,
revision, and editing in preparing a publishable draft.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
The writing demonstrates thoughtful
planning, significant revision, and careful editing in preparing a
publishable draft.
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
Additional Criteria
|
|
|
|