Monday, December 31, 2012

Embedded Assessment 2 Rubric/English 9


Embedded Assessment 1 Rubric/English 9
Presenting an Interview Narrative
Scoring Criteria
Emerging: 2 (70-79%)
Proficient: 3 (80-89)
Exemplary: 4(90-100)
Ideas
An incident may not be described in detail and little to no attention is paid to the descriptive categories.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
The narrative describes an incident from the person’s high school experience clearly and effectively. The writer mentions examples from the three descriptive categories.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
The narrative insightfully describes at least one incident from the person’s high school experience which influenced his/her coming of age with careful attention to detail.
The writer vividly uses examples from the three descriptive categories.
1  2  3  4  5 6  7  8  9  10
Organization
The narrative may not be multi-paragraphed and/or organized in a logical fashion.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
The narrative is multi-paragraphed and organized in a logical fashion.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
The narrative is multi-paragraphed and organized in a way that enhances the reader’s understanding.
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
Use of Language
The voice of the interviewee is not clear, imagery, diction, and use of quotations are inappropriate or missing.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Clear imagery, diction, and use of quotations convey a sense of the interviewee’s voice.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Vivid imagery, careful diction, and effective use of direct and indirect quotes convey a strong sense of the interviewee’s voice.
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
Conventions
Frequent errors in standard writing conventions interfere with the meaning. Quotations from the interview are not properly incorporated into the text.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Though some errors may appear, they do not seriously impede readability. The writer properly punctuates and capitalizes quotations in the text.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Writing is virtually error free. The writer uses proper punctuation and capitalization to smoothly
Embed quotations from the interviewee’s voice.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Evidence of Writing Process
The writing lacks evidence of planning, revision, and/or editing. The draft is not ready for publication
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
The writing demonstrates planning, revision, and editing in preparing a publishable draft.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
The writing demonstrates thoughtful planning, significant revision, and careful editing in preparing a publishable draft.
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
Additional Criteria




No comments:

Post a Comment